Skip to content
May 22 / scott.campbell

Lanced Ham

Water activity is great.  This proclamation shouldn’t be surprising, given I work for a water activity meter company.  Still, it does have a little ‘splainin’ to do.  While water activity is very precise, sampling technique can influence readings.  What’s more, charcuterie that has been sampled properly is likely to end up with holes in it – not an attractive quality to many consumers.  This underscores the fact that you must cut away part of the product and put it into a sample cup in order to test its water activity.

SENSOR-squareThe ideal method would be one that can detect small changes in the water of the meat, but is “in-situ”, a fancy word for measuring something in place instead of taking a sample back to the lab.  So I had an idea.  Why not use soil moisture sensors to look at changes in the water of a ham as it cures?  I’ll admit that the idea crossed my mind because my employer also makes said sensors (see decagon.com).  These devices sense changes in soil moisture due to the difference between soil’s dielectric constant  (2) and water’s dielectric constant (80).  The readings will be relative since I’d have to calibrate the sensors to relate their readings to water activity or moisture content.  Still, after considering this a while, a few things became clear:

  1. This will make life way easier.  From the comfort of my Costco-sourced task chair, I can look at the sensor readings on my computer screen every few hours and know whether things are going well.
  2. The above sensor (named GS-3) also measures electrical conductivity.  This will probably tell me how well the salt seeps into the ham during the salting phase.  Since we ended up with overly-salty prosciutto as thanks for our 10 months of effort last time, I’m hoping this comes in handy.
  3. If small or medium-sized processed meat companies want to monitor the curing of their meats, this would be a simple and relatively inexpensive way to do it.  A barebones water activity meter costs about $2k, while a sensor/datalogger combo would cost perhaps $700.  That’s still a hefty sum for small businesses and hobbyists, but less than a water activity meter.

So here’s the plan.  Plunge the GS-3 sensor deep into the ham, pack the ham in salt, and wait about 2 weeks.  The ham will lose water and take on salt.  Then, as the ham cures over 5 months to 1 year, it’ll dry out.  I’ll watch the readings change over time, and post them here on the blog.  During that same time, I plan on making some more salami and peperone – I’ll also outfit some of those sausages with sensors so we can see that data, too.  We’ll test the water activity when we think they’re done, but not before.  This will make for less holes in the meat, and more product for me and my co-workers to consume.  I think that’s something we can all live with.

Leave a comment